GreduQuestHomeLink

Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The debate surrounding the optimal course of study for university students elicits contrasting perspectives. One school of thought advocates for unrestricted academic freedom, allowing students to pursue any subject of their choosing. Conversely, another viewpoint posits that higher education should prioritize subjects deemed practically beneficial for future societal needs, particularly those within the realms of science and technology. This essay will explore both arguments before offering a considered opinion.

Proponents of unrestricted academic choice argue that forcing students into predetermined fields stifles creativity and intellectual exploration. Allowing students to follow their passions fosters deeper engagement with their studies, leading to enhanced critical thinking and innovation. Furthermore, a broad education across diverse disciplines cultivates well-rounded individuals capable of addressing complex societal challenges from multiple perspectives. For instance, a history student might contribute unique insights to technological development by examining its historical and ethical implications, offering a counterpoint to purely technical considerations.

Conversely, those who champion a focus on science and technology emphasize the pressing need for skilled professionals in these sectors to drive economic growth and address global challenges like climate change and disease. Prioritizing these subjects ensures a steady supply of graduates equipped to contribute to innovation and technological advancement, thereby enhancing a nation's competitiveness in the global marketplace. Singapore's emphasis on STEM education, for example, has demonstrably propelled its technological and economic progress.

While the necessity for skilled science and technology professionals is undeniable, I believe that limiting university education solely to these fields would be detrimental. A balanced approach is crucial, one that acknowledges the value of both practical and theoretical knowledge. Universities should encourage students to explore a diverse range of subjects while also providing robust support for those pursuing studies in science and technology. This could involve offering scholarships and research opportunities, as well as fostering interdisciplinary collaboration between different departments.

In conclusion, while the pragmatic benefits of prioritizing science and technology are evident, a holistic approach to university education that values both individual passions and societal needs is ultimately more beneficial. By fostering a diverse and intellectually stimulating environment, universities can empower students to become well-rounded, innovative thinkers capable of contributing meaningfully to society in a variety of fields.